"appliances To The Countryside": Benefit Farmers Or To Help Enterprises?

Share:    

"appliances To The Countryside": Benefit Farmers Or To Help Enterprises

?

Ministry of Finance and Business Department 22 announced to expand the rural

Consumption The " Home Appliances The countryside "will take place in Shandong, Henan and Sichuan provinces of the first pilot. Provinces farmers can buy specifically for rural markets limit the production of household appliances, but also from the finance department to apply for" home appliances to the countryside "subsidies. Ministry of Finance Zeng, deputy director of building safety, said the guidance through financial subsidies for home appliances to the countryside, is the focus of the financial funding support from the

Investment Export expansion to the consumption of a major fiscal policy innovations. Aim is to expand rural consumption market. (Dec. 23, "Beijing News", "Beijing Times")

Farmers Buyer Electricity can also be financial subsidies, this is indeed innovative, if the home in the pension, medical care, their children still have money left to buy other than

TV , Refrigerator (Freezers), Mobile Words, but also affordable, "home appliances to the countryside," working really benefit farmers. However, the "home appliances to the countryside" is not necessarily the farmers applauded, applauded the fear is real household electrical appliance enterprises.

First, while farmers will have to buy household appliances, but most farmers will be able to increase income. Only increase, and farmers need to buy, and no financial subsidies, they will buy. However, in recent years the task of increasing, or even difficult. Sources said that this year the per capita income of farmers is expected to exceed 4,000 yuan, an increase of the ratio of 7%. Apparently farmers income, and in fact in the case of high prices, more and more money is worthless, and people's livelihood on the storm, farmers will overtaken Qigan the action!

Second, the Treasury and the Ministry of Commerce lists the strong will of the farmers to buy color TV sets, refrigerators (freezers), mobile phones, air conditioning,

Washing machine , The color TV and washing machine almost

Life Necessities, and conditions of farmers have already bought, even if no conditions of financial subsidy they would not buy it, As for refrigerators, air conditioners, cell phones give away the peasants, it's usually for decoration, because farmers can not afford one, the second is not useful, for example to buy a refrigerator so that farmers know this?

Third, the "home appliances to the countryside" products are likely to more than poor sales of the low commodity market, a few hundred dollars have difficulty in marketing the appliance is likely to be sold to farmers increases. Despite signed agreements against "dumping" out of a said product, but if there are thousand color TV manufacturers it? While that is strictly

Tender Purchase However, the farmers can not be eliminated to help companies "dumping" of poor sales appliances is suspect. In my opinion, in order to finance subsidies to expand rural consumption market, not only achieving its purpose, contrary would be most in doubt.

"Appliances to the countryside" financial subsidies, fiscal policy is indeed a major innovation? I thought the "bad idea" is suspect. The first is to help farmers increase income in the current consumption is more than urgent to farmers, because farmers are very poor, to subsidize the way "to" farmers money or help corporate spending, not the humane policy. Second, in

Energy The context of emission reduction has become a consensus, to help enterprises

Sell Suspected low-grade non-environmentally friendly home appliances Energy does not meet the policy orientation. Third, state revenue increased, but the people still living in the "new three big mountains" of oppression, the urgent need to improve people's livelihood, "home appliances to the countryside" financial subsidies to the surface is actually helping to benefit farmers home appliances business, there are squandering taxpayers hard-earned money is suspect.

There are reports that state revenues this year could reach 5.1 trillion yuan, which is a good thing, that we are more and more financial resources to improve people's livelihood. I think, significant fiscal policy innovation should be committed to improving the majority of the population accounts for the livelihood of farmers, the farmers increase income, reduce the income gap between urban and rural residents. To really narrow the income gap between urban and rural residents, we must increase the proportion of farmers income growth, at least the same proportion with the increase of income of urban residents. This requires, including the central government, including all resources to help farmers increase income. Farmers are not rich, the state is not strong. Not well-off farmers, there is no well-off society. Solve "three rural issues" key is to make farmers rich, but lip service to not work.

POST COMMENT

"What is beauty" "Relaxation Techniques for Anxiety" "Insurance For Your Business" "I haven't got time to worry about things like: professional indemnity insurance" "I Live You" - Keeping Your Marriage Strong "Collective Madness in Online Retailing" (Even 'Dummies' can give it away) "Chattel" And Its Link To Insurance "An apple a day keeps the doctor away…" "2nd Chance" Review - Read First Before Buying Zhiwa Ling Paro: Best Yoga Accommodations In Bhutan You Really Think Not Seal Can Keep Online Tera Gold You Must Want To Get Samsung Galaxy S2 Insurance Quote You Have Chance To Win A Stunning Wedding Dress Online