Insurances.net
insurances.net » Children Insurance » Massachusetts Child Custody Determination Best Interest Parental Rights Lawyers Attorneys
Auto Insurance Life Insurance Health Insurance Family Insurance Travel Insurance Mortgage Insurance Accident Insurance Buying Insurance Housing Insurance Personal Insurance Medical Insurance Property Insurance Pregnant Insurance Internet Insurance Mobile Insurance Pet Insurance Employee Insurance Dental Insurance Liability Insurance Baby Insurance Children Insurance Boat Insurance Cancer Insurance Insurance Quotes Others
]

Massachusetts Child Custody Determination Best Interest Parental Rights Lawyers Attorneys

Massachusetts Child Custody Determination Best Interest Parental Rights Lawyers Attorneys

JANET VERA CARR vs. ROBERT EARLE CARR.

The Father's Group, Inc., the Coalition for the Preservation of Fatherhood, and William L. Bruce filed briefs as amici curiae.

APPEALS COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS

March 13, 1998, DecidedMassachusetts Child Custody Determination Best Interest Parental Rights Lawyers Attorneys


While the father recognizes that the best interests of the child is the proper standard to be applied in deciding custody issues under G. L. c. 208, 31, he asserts that due process considerations require that a determination of a child's best interests must be based on the least intrusive interference with parental rights and that any limitation imposed upon parental rights must be based on a detailed demonstration of substantial harm to the child from the exerciseof those rights.

Issue:

Whether the family court judge applied the wrong analysis in settling the custody issue and asserted that a determination of the child's best interests had to be based on the least intrusive interference with parental rights?

The court affirmed the family court's judgment and held that the family court judge neither abused his discretion nor applied an improper analysis in settling the custody issue in favor of the mother. The court held that the best interests of the child, including the child's happiness and welfare, was the proper standard to be applied in deciding custody issues under ch. 208, 31.The court noted that the family court judge imposed no limitations upon the father's right to continue to provide academic stimulus or a course of study for the child and held that the family court's findings, which included the child's preference to remain with the mother, were amply supported by the record. Thus, the court held that sole custody was properly awarded to the mother under ch. 208, 31 based on the family court's findings that the relationship of the parties was dysfunctional and one of continuous conflict.

Disclaimer:

These summaries are provided by the SRIS Law Group. They represent the firm's unofficial views of the Justices' opinions. The original opinions should be consulted for their authoritative content

Massachusetts Child Custody Determination Best Interest Parental Rights Lawyers Attorneys

By: Atchuthan Sriskandarajah
Massachusetts Child Custody Care Protection Parents Married Lawyers Attorneys Help Your Child Deal with Relocation Stress Massachusetts Child Custody Minor Legal Custody Guardians-ad-litem Lawyers Attorneys California's Focus On Pre-K Ed Looks At All Areas Of Early Child Development Important things to remember when purchasing a booster seat for your child Setting boundaries for children in a clam way Ways To Profit From Your Child University Move How to Make Delicious Cookies That Are Easy to Ship to Soldiers, Kids at College, Etc #7 Amazing Bunkbeds For Young Children Talent Identification in Children How to Boost your Child's Confidence & Self Esteem Causes of Hair Loss in Children How Teens Use Hair Extensions For Creative Looks
Write post print
www.insurances.net guest:  register | login | search IP(3.141.166.190) / Processed in 0.014492 second(s), 6 queries , Gzip enabled debug code: 22 , 3304, 956,
Massachusetts Child Custody Determination Best Interest Parental Rights Lawyers Attorneys