subject: The Thing About Personal Injury Law [print this page] The Thing About Personal Injury Law
It is your typical personal injury lawyer who best resembles a famous American humorist. As each of them pushes the pity button, he is applying the best method of raising money which involves triggering the emotions of the jury. In terms of their pity strategy, it has a darker, destructive side and this is what you can see in a recent heart chilling murder suicide in Alexandria, Virginia.
You may encounter variations, varying directly with the strength of the tug on the jurors' emotions, when it comes to the amount of a jury award. One problem with the pity technique is that it usually convinces not only the jurors, but also the injured plaintiff and the plaintiff's family, of the bleakness of his future. This is why most lawyers recognized the need to rethink their moves.
The inevitable first reaction of a newly disabled person and his family is that meaningful life has ended. Next, they will have court battles and trial planning to deal with.
An Oakland, California consultant to personal injury lawyers, and herself an attorney said that to her, these social stirrings carry a special message for the trial bar. It is important that personal injury damages no longer be measured by the degree of a plaintiff's situation. The consideration of the costs of regaining the meaning of one's life will be a whole lot better. When it comes to trial lawyers, their worth is measured by how well they can dramatize his client's plight as pathetic and abhorrent but according to the consultant, most plaintiffs do not need to emphasize the degrading type of evidence that apparently was largely unavoidable in this man's suit. In this case, clients are normally directed to refrain from independent activities including caring for their own personal needs before and during the trial. Monetary reward can be gained with that lack of movement.
For this California lawyer, this is a much better approach as compared to the weird reasoning of the Vietnam War era which held that destroying a village can save it. According to her, it is possible to get a positive approach from the jurors when it comes to the shift of focus from one's meaningless life to a fruitful one. What may be included when it comes to the typical costs of independence in this case is buying and maintaining various kinds of sophisticated high tech equipment that can assist in mobility and functioning.
It could also be those of job training, personal attendant and homemaking services, sex and peer counseling, and substantial modifications perhaps utilizing robotics and computer technology to the plaintiff's home or workplace. There should be no negligence when it comes to the inevitable social consequences of disability, discrimination and stigma. Here, the injuries are not the responsible parties for these problems but the archaic attitudes of society toward disabled persons are.
Among them are inaccessible buildings and transportation systems, job and housing discrimination, and social exclusion generally. A realistic basis is created when damages from such causes lead to arguments and doing so for a large reward does not mean demeaning the individual. Living with severe disability and the accompanying social stigma is in itself a challenge. Nevertheless, you can still have a useful and rewarding life. In this case, no one should convince the disabled person to see himself as useless.
welcome to Insurances.net (https://www.insurances.net)
