subject: Does Cultural Globalisation Really Exist? [print this page] For the first time in the whole history of the world we face the phenomenon of not just globalisation, butCULTURAL GLOBALISATION. The question is that Does Cultural Globalisation really Exist? Undoubtedly cultural values and identities are being shaped and reshaped with the media playing a significant role in our daily lives. Many of our ideas about the world, our understanding of what is happening everyday and, it can be argued,even our values come from beyond ourpersonal experience they are formed by what we see and hear via the media.
We receive ideas about the world as packaged or bite-sized versions of events and issues straight from the media and we just know this has a strong influence on individuals and ultimately society as a whole. With the spread of the media to even remote places on the planet, its influence brings out important issues concerning the affect on national or local cultures and their responses. Young people of the MTV generation around the world probably have more in common witheach otherthan with their parents. But MTV reflects the attitudes and values of western countries, especially America, and is argued to be contributing to the homogenisation of global culture which, according to research, is expanding rapidly.
Cultural globalisation is a result of the economic activities in developed countries of news and entertainment the media that produce television programmes, music and movies and distribute them across the world. This happens because THEY can, whilst other nations cant. American dominance in this respect is uppermost because of a powerful economy and because of the English language. Even the statistics on book translations shows the number of American books translated from English far outweighs those being translated into English. However, this American dominance would not have come about without the economic power of the big corporations.
In some countries, American television constitutes 50% of the programs as the host country does not have the resources to fund the cost of production and distribution of their own. Expensive, blockbuster Americanmovies have been a dominant force but are seen to represent a type of homogenous, uniform culture permeated by western capitalistic values full of elaborate technical effects and focus on stunts, action, and violence instead of character and emotion. Undoubtedly, action movies are more easily understood in non-English speaking, diverse cultures in other words they can travel.
To a large extent CULTURAL GLOBALISATION is happening by default because of economic advantage & that of the US. However, all is not lost. India has become the worlds leading producer of fiction films, with Bollywood circulating films to Indian Asia, Indian Africa and the UK. France, too, has retained a strong film industry which has received Government subsidies. If Cultural Globalisation is an accident of economic power then we can argue that as other countries rise in economic power Westernisation or Americanisation will lessen andthe worldwill be treated to a greater variety of media input. Get more ideas on Cultural globalization @ http://www.deborahswallow.com/2009/08/04/cultural-globalisation-does-it-exist/
by: Deborah Swallow
welcome to Insurances.net (https://www.insurances.net)
