Insurances.net
insurances.net » Personal Insurance » Basics of Personal Injury Related Legal Theories
Auto Insurance Life Insurance Health Insurance Family Insurance Travel Insurance Mortgage Insurance Accident Insurance Buying Insurance Housing Insurance Personal Insurance Medical Insurance Property Insurance Pregnant Insurance Internet Insurance Mobile Insurance Pet Insurance Employee Insurance Dental Insurance Liability Insurance Baby Insurance Children Insurance Boat Insurance Cancer Insurance Insurance Quotes Others
]

Basics of Personal Injury Related Legal Theories

Basics of Personal Injury Related Legal Theories

Basics of Personal Injury Related Legal Theories


Any injury lawsuit in Florida needs to have its basis on any of the three types of tort liability theories existent in the state. The application of a certain theory requires understanding of the laws and their interpretation. For this reason, you need to find a personal injury lawyer to work on your behalf.

You may not have an in-depth knowledge of the injury laws; however, it would be of help if you have a basic idea about the tort liability theories. Here is a quick look at the basics of these legal theories as applicable on a Naples injury case.

Intentional Tort Theory comes into play when the entity responsible for the incident, causing the injuries, was aware of the consequences at the time of committing the act. Apart from physical injuries, defamation, libel (using print/television/radio) and slander (using verbal form), is also within this category. Basics of Personal Injury Related Legal Theories


Suppose an individual hits you intentionally to cause harm. You suffer injuries for this. If your lawyer is capable of establishing the causation between the two as well as the malicious intent, you may be able to recover compensatory damages (to settle for your losses) and punitive damages (to punish the wrongdoer).

Negligence Theory is perhaps the most common basis of these cases. To establish this, aNaples personal injury lawyer needs to establish there was a duty to care, there was a breach of this duty, there were injuries to another, there was a causation relation between the breach and the injuries.

Suppose the driver who hits you is drunk. In such a state, he would not be able to adhere to the duty to care, for other drivers and pedestrians. His negligence is the cause of your injuries. In this case, you may get a fair and adequate' compensation to cover your economic and non-economic damages from the negligent entity.

Strict Liability Theory applies when the defendant's activities are a proximate cause of the plaintiff's injuries. There is no need to prove negligence or ill intentions lawyer needs to do is establish the activity as a proximate cause of injuries. This encompasses dangerous activities of individuals, premises and products liability, and so on.

Suppose a faulty braking system on the driver's car was the reason of the accident. In such a circumstance, your lawyer would need to assess responsibility of the manufacturer or seller for the injuries. If there is a defect in the design, manufacture or marketing, the responsibility for the accident shifts from the driver to the manufacturer or seller.
Chicago Personal Injury Statistics and Tips Personal Shoppers - High Street Store Versus Independent Personal Injury law – How do Depositions Work? What Complete I Must To Be Familiar With Once I Own Taken An Insurance Project Out What To Keep In Mind When You Hire A Personal Injury Lawyer What Evidence is Needed in a Minnesota Personal Injury Case Who are Brand Personalization? How an MN Divorce Attorney or an MN Personal Injury Attorney Can Help How Can Personal Injury Lawyers Assist You? Personal Injury Lawyers to Stand for Financial Claims Effectively Handling Personal Life Changes Create Your Own Personalised Photo Cushions What Should I do After Suffering a Personal Injury?
Write post print
www.insurances.net guest:  register | login | search IP(3.83.87.94) / Processed in 0.012494 second(s), 6 queries , Gzip enabled debug code: 16 , 2680, 967,
Basics of Personal Injury Related Legal Theories